Brunner Island, LLC
Climate Impact & Sustainability Data (2015, 2016)
Reporting Period: 2015
Environmental Metrics
ESG Focus Areas
- Environmental
Environmental Achievements
- Implemented a Fugitive Dust Control Plan to minimize dust emissions from Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) handling and storage.
Climate Goals & Targets
Environmental Challenges
- Fugitive dust emissions from Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) impoundments.
Mitigation Strategies
- Watered roads and dikes as necessary.
- Sluiced bottom ash with water to prevent dust during transport.
- Dewatered bottom ash to ensure adequate moisture to prevent dusting.
- Used pipelines to transport fly ash and scrubber slurry.
- Implemented a thickening process to increase solids content in slurry, reducing moisture and minimizing dusting.
- Utilized pozzolonic characteristics of fly ash to create a concrete-like material minimizing dusting.
Supply Chain Management
Climate-Related Risks & Opportunities
Reporting Period: 2016
Environmental Metrics
ESG Focus Areas
- Environmental
- Safety
Environmental Achievements
- Factors of safety for the critical failure section comply with the requirements of the USEPA rule for the long-term maximum storage pool and seismic load cases for the section analyzed, as well as for the surcharge case using an extrapolated groundwater surface profile.
Climate Goals & Targets
Environmental Challenges
- Shallow slope failures observed previously suggested that the factor of safety for deep-seated failure surfaces may also be critical.
- Moisture on the downstream face and toe of the embankment was more pronounced than at other sections of the embankment, with wet soils and ponded water extending up to 5 feet up the slope.
- Variation in the fines content of the embankment fill material, especially the higher fine contents at Section 1-1, may also partially explain the higher embankment phreatic level.
- Potential for overtopping the embankments.
Mitigation Strategies
- Slope stability analyses of the critical section of the embankment were performed for the long-term maximum storage (normal) pool, maximum surcharge pool, and seismic load cases.
- The potential for liquefaction was determined through a triggering analysis using methods proposed by Idriss and Boulanger (2008) and Youd and Idriss (2001).
- Seismic slope stability analyses were performed using the pseudostatic seismic coefficient method.
- Deformation analyses were conducted using the Jansen method (1988).
Supply Chain Management
Climate-Related Risks & Opportunities
Reporting Standards
Frameworks Used: USEPA 40 CFR Parts 257 and 261